Discussion:
[Linuxptp-users] Received packets without timestamp
Tino Mettler
2017-03-07 09:23:40 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

I get the following messages a few times per day:

port 1: received DELAY_REQ without timestamp
port 1: received SYNC without timestamp

According to the source, this means that the kernel driver did not
supply a timestamp from the PHC for that packets. The NIC is an Intel
I219-LM. I did not find anything useful in Google regarding this. Is
there anything I can do to avoid this?

Regards,
Tino
Keller, Jacob E
2017-03-08 23:23:51 UTC
Permalink
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 1:24 AM
Subject: [Linuxptp-users] Received packets without timestamp
Hi,
port 1: received DELAY_REQ without timestamp
port 1: received SYNC without timestamp
According to the source, this means that the kernel driver did not
supply a timestamp from the PHC for that packets. The NIC is an Intel
I219-LM. I did not find anything useful in Google regarding this. Is
there anything I can do to avoid this?
Regards,
Tino
I'm not sure. I've seen this message a few times and haven't been able to reproduce it reliably enough. It shouldn't impact the functionality, and as long as its only intermittent drops it's not a big deal.

Thanks,
Jake
Richard Cochran
2017-03-09 06:01:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Keller, Jacob E
I'm not sure. I've seen this message a few times and haven't been able to reproduce it reliably enough. It shouldn't impact the functionality, and as long as its only intermittent drops it's not a big deal.
I have also seen this occasionally on the i210. I *think* the i210
should never drop a time stamp, in theory, but there obviously is some
issue. It is rare, and so it hasn't bothered me. Other HW drop time
stamps by design!

Thanks,
Richard

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...