Discussion:
[Linuxptp-users] Does ptp4l support unicast ?
W.F. YANG
2016-07-09 16:24:28 UTC
Permalink
Hello,
Does the ptp4l support ip unicast instead of ip multicast for all
transmission, not just for delay request ?
Besides, is it a portion of ptp protocol standard ?

*Best Regards*

*Yang Wenfeng*
Richard Cochran
2016-07-09 18:57:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by W.F. YANG
Does the ptp4l support ip unicast instead of ip multicast for all
transmission, not just for delay request ?
No.
Post by W.F. YANG
Besides, is it a portion of ptp protocol standard ?
Yes, unicast is an option within the IEEE 1588 standard.


HTH,
Richard
David Cemin
2016-11-15 14:20:51 UTC
Permalink
Hi Richard,

Since it is not supported, do you know if there is anyone working on this
already ? If not, do you know what the effort would be to have this support
implemented within ptp4l ?

Thank you

regards,

David
Post by Richard Cochran
Post by W.F. YANG
Does the ptp4l support ip unicast instead of ip multicast for all
transmission, not just for delay request ?
No.
Post by W.F. YANG
Besides, is it a portion of ptp protocol standard ?
Yes, unicast is an option within the IEEE 1588 standard.
HTH,
Richard
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries
present their vision of the future. This family event has something for
everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today.
http://sdm.link/attshape
_______________________________________________
Linuxptp-users mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-users
--
David Cemin
+1 343-777-1735
Richard Cochran
2016-11-16 08:47:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by David Cemin
Since it is not supported, do you know if there is anyone working on this
already ?
Not that I know of.
Post by David Cemin
If not, do you know what the effort would be to have this support
implemented within ptp4l ?
I think it would require substantial effort. It entails implementing
the following options from 1588:

16.1 Unicast message negotiation
17.5 Unicast discovery
17.6 Acceptable master table
[ Since this is very similar to the unicastMasterTable of 17.5,
you can kill two birds with one stone. ]

We already have some support for subscriptions and notifications, and
so you would naturally build upon that.

Thanks,
Richard




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loading...